ArticlePloS one2025
AI-driven approaches for dysgraphia diagnosis using online and offline handwriting data: A comprehensive scoping review.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dysgraphia, a neurodevelopmental disorder impacting writing abilities, is often overlooked or misdiagnosed, affecting academic and daily life activities. It affects both children, especially school-aged, and adults, potentially stemming from brain trauma or neurological diseases. Early diagnosis is crucial for effective management and intervention. With advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), there is potential to improve early diagnosis and intervention through automated detection methods. This scoping review aims to explore available studies employing AI-based models for dysgraphia diagnosis and identify the highest performance models and their challenges to suggest future improvements. Comprehensive searches were conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and SpringerLink until April 2024. Included studies are original research articles focusing on dysgraphia detection using AI-based predictive models with image processing techniques on handwritten images. Data extraction was done using a structured form in Google Sheets, capturing study characteristics, datasets, methods, and results. Out of 177 initial papers, 21 met the inclusion criteria. Studies span nearly a decade, with 38% being conference papers and 62% journal articles from various countries. AI models, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Support Vector Machines (SVMs), demonstrated high accuracy rates, often surpassing 90%, with comprehensive feature extraction methods enhancing performance. Significant challenges include small sample sizes and language-specific models. AI-based models, especially advanced ones like CNNs and SVMs, significantly enhance dysgraphia diagnosis, offering faster and more accurate assessments than traditional methods. Future research should focus on larger, more diverse datasets, language-independent models, and standardized evaluation metrics. Integrating AI-based tools in educational and healthcare settings can revolutionize dysgraphia management, improving academic outcomes and support for affected individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.