Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41474649›Full record

ReviewNeuroimmunomodulation2026

Some Basics on Innate Neuroimmunology for Nonspecialists.

Jan Pieter Konsman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroimmunomodulation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jan Pieter KonsmanIMMUNOlogy from CONcepts and ExPeriments to Translation, CNRS UMR 5164, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France, jan-pieter.konsman@u-bordeaux.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough this seems to be common knowledge among experts, it is important to remind readers that two populations, namely, brain microglia and macrophages, found in different compartments of the central nervous system, play essential roles in innate neuroimmunology. SUMMARY: Here, some historical and conceptual background will be provided that should allow the reader to place recent findings on these cells in some context and perspective. KEY MESSAGES: It will be argued that (1) the brain is not devoid of immune response, but does represent an immune-privileged site, (2) innate neuroimmunology concerns brain border macrophages and parenchymal microglia, (3) even though brain border macrophages have been less extensively studied than parenchymal microglia, it is progressively becoming clear that these populations play different roles in physiological and pathological conditions and (4) while it is tempting to only use the latest technologies to obtain new findings, it is also essential, for the sake of science, to "triangulate" with findings obtained with more classic approaches. To determine whether and when innate neuroimmune responses are protective or pathological will be an important aim for future research.

Indexed as

BrainImmunity, InnateMacrophagesMicrogliaNeuroimmunomodulationAnimalsHumansCNS compartmentsInnate immunologyMacrophagesMicroglia

Identifiers

PMID41474649
PMCPMC12867502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.