Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41474645›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Effectiveness of Digital Interventions for Low-Income, Food-Insecure Populations: Natural Language Processing Study of WIC Smartphone App User Reviews, 2013-2024.

Jihye Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jihye LeeStan Richards School of Advertising and Public Relations, Moody College of Communication, The University of Texas at Austin, 300 W Dean Keeton DMC 4.314 (A1200), Austin, TX, 78712, United States, 1 512 471 1101.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0245-7250

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) is a federal nutrition assistance program for low-income, food-insecure mothers and young children in the United States. Despite its intended goals, many eligible individuals forgo WIC benefits, in part due to administrative burden-defined as the complex, often frustrating processes encountered when navigating public benefit programs. In response, a range of digital interventions and policy waivers were introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic, but their effectiveness in reducing barriers remains unclear. Objective: Drawing from administrative burden theory and human-computer interaction research, this study examined user reviews of WIC smartphone apps (WIC Apps) used by local agencies. Specifically, it investigated (1) how obstacles to WIC access manifested in daily app use, (2) how user experiences shifted after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and (3) how these changes were associated with app ratings. Methods: An original dataset of user reviews (Nreview=28,212) was compiled for 26 WIC Apps between 2013 and 2024. Structural topic modeling identified 8 key themes, and sentiment was examined with Robustly Optimized Bidirectional Encoder Representations From Transformers Pretraining Approach. Analyses compared topic prevalence and sentiment distributions before and after COVID-19. Mixed-effects models examined the relationship between topics, sentiment, and app ratings. Results: Technical concerns related to account authentication and login, document upload, and app updates were among the most prevalent themes. These issues were typically expressed with negative sentiment and appeared more frequently in pre-COVID-19 reviews than in post-COVID-19 reviews. Although reliability problems (eg, outages and maintenance) persisted, post-COVID-19 reviews increasingly emphasized features that facilitated program tracking, shopping and benefit redemption, and general ease of use, which were generally described with positive sentiment. Mixed-effects analyses indicated that these post-COVID-19 topics were significantly associated with higher app ratings (program tracking: B=0.21, SE=0.06; P=.001; shopping and redemption: B=0.18, SE=0.07; P=.01; and ease of use: B=0.10, SE=0.05; P=.04), whereas pre-COVID-19 concerns were not associated with ratings (Ps>.05). When sentiment was added to the mixed-effect model, it became the dominant factor: negative sentiment was associated with lower ratings (B=-1.71, SE=0.03; P<.001), and positive sentiment was associated with higher ratings (B=1.78, SE=0.03; P<.001). After accounting for sentiment, no individual topic was significantly associated with ratings (Ps>.05), suggesting that sentiment contributed to much of the variance previously linked to topics. Conclusions: User-centered digital interventions, such as WIC Apps, have the potential to support WIC access and participation.

Indexed as

Food AssistanceFood InsecurityMobile ApplicationsNatural Language ProcessingPovertySmartphoneCOVID-19FemaleHumansSARS-CoV-2United Statesadministrative burdenCOVID-19digital interventionsnatural language processingsmartphone appsSpecial Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and ChildrenWIC

Identifiers

PMID41474645
PMCPMC12755294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.