Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41474554›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Decision-making components and times revealed by the single-trial electroencephalogram.

Gabriel Weindel, Jelmer P Borst, Leendert van Maanen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gabriel WeindelUniversity of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7592-1686
Jelmer P Borst *University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4493-8223
Leendert van Maanen *Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9120-1075

Funding

Air Force Research Laboratory OARD FA8655-22-1-7003Horizon Europe Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions 10.3030/101066503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decision-making stems from a sequence of information processing steps between the onset of the stimulus and the response. Despite extensive research, uncertainty remains about the actual cognitive sequence involved that leads to the reaction time. Using the hidden multivariate pattern method, we modeled the single-trial electroencephalogram of participants performing a decision task as a sequence of an unknown number of events estimated as trial-recurrent, time-varying, stable topographies. We provide evidence for five events occurring during participants' decision-making with two visual encoding events and three events capturing respectively attention orientation, decision, and motor execution. This interpretation is supported by the observation that a targeted manipulation of stimulus intensity yields Piéron's law in the interval between encoding and attention orientation, and Fechner's law in the interval between attention orientation and decision commitment. The final decision-related event is represented in the brain as a ramping signal in parietal areas whose timing, amplitude, and build-up predict the participants' decision accuracy.

Indexed as

BrainDecision MakingElectroencephalographyAdultAttentionFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung Adultdecisionelectroencephalographyevent-related potentialhumanneurosciencepsychophysicsreaction timesingle-trial

Identifiers

PMID41474554
PMCPMC12755882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.