ArticleEJNMMI research2025
A deep-learning noise reduction algorithm outperforms the spatial filters previously required for bone SPECT on a high-speed whole-body 360° CZT-camera.
Article in EJNMMI research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06782438 (Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Reducing Noise on Fast Whole-body Bone Tomoscintigraphy Acquisitions Recorded by a 360 Degree Cadmium-Zinc-Tellurid Camera), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Reducing Noise on Fast Whole-body Bone Tomoscintigraphy Acquisitions Recorded by a 360 Degree Cadmium-Zinc-Tellurid Camera
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpatial filters are required to suppress the statistical noise of SPECT images but with an unavoidable smoothing effect that further decreases the SUV and contrast. This study assesses a deep-learning noise reduction (DLNR) algorithm, previously developed to further reduce bone SPECT recording time on a high-speed whole-body 360° CZT-camera, when used instead of, rather than in addition to, the conventional spatial filters (CSF) recommended for this camera.
resultsThe SUVmax of bone lesions (114 definite arthritis or metastasis lesions) and the resolution recovery coefficients of small and medium phantom spheres, were higher for DLNR than CSF or the combination of CSF plus DLNR (CSF-DLNR) (all p < 0.001), whereas the relative noises were lower for DLNR or CSF-DLNR, as compared with CSF (p < 0.001). Consequently, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was dramatically higher for DLNR, as compared with CSF, and also CSF-DLNR, especially for small- and medium-sized structures. Compared with CSF, DLNR provided an almost two-fold CNR increase for the sphere and lesions in the range of one cm
conclusionWhen used alone, this DLNR algorithm enhances the contrast-to-noise ratio and quantification of bone lesions, especially those of small or medium sizes. It outperforms conventional spatial filters and provides remarkable image quality for routine analysis of bone SPECT from the high-speed whole-body 360° CZT camera. However, further research and validation studies are still necessary before a widespread adoption in clinical practice. KEY POINTS: Question: How does a deep-learning noise reduction algorithm, previously developed to further reduce bone SPECT recording times on a high-speed whole-body 360° CZT-camera, work when used instead of, rather than in addition to, the conventional spatial filters recommended for this camera. Pertinent findings: When used alone, this deep-learning noise reduction algorithm provides a high level of image denoising and better preserves the activities of small- to medium-sized bone structures and lesions than conventional spatial filters do, leading to a dramatic increase in the corresponding contrast-to-noise ratios. IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: Such a deep-learning noise reduction algorithm could be used not only to reduce SPECT recording time when added to conventional spatial filters, but also to improve image quality and resolution when used alone.
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT06782438, Registered 27 February 2025, https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?id=NCT06782438 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.