Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41474511›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry2025

Assessment of quality control and effect of radiolysis on the in vivo biodistribution of [

Eline L Hooijman, Carolline M Ntihabose, Stijn L W Koolen, Maryana Handula, Savanne Beekman, Debra Stuurman, Corrina de Ridder, Jan R de Jong, Jordy R J P van de Merbel, Nyah Rook and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Eline L HooijmanDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Carolline M NtihaboseDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Stijn L W KoolenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Maryana HandulaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Savanne BeekmanDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Debra StuurmanDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Corrina de RidderDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan R de JongDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jordy R J P van de MerbelDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Nyah RookDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Else A AalbersbergDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tessa F F T VerversDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Peter LavermanDepartment of Medical Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jeroen J M A HendrikxDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Erik de BloisDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. r.deblois@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0659-7819

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the challenges in optimizing PSMA-based therapies for the treatment of prostate cancer is the stability of the radiopharmaceutical, defined by the degradation of radiolabeled compounds due to exposure to ionizing radiation (radiolysis). Radiolysis of a radiopharmaceutical is difficult to measure and can influence the biodistrubion of radiopharmaceuticals in vivo, possibly leading to toxicity or suboptimal outcomes. Therefore, an inter-laboratory study was performed to confirm accurate detection of radiolysed [

resultsMultiple HPLC-methods were compared to evaluate the analysis of degraded radiopharmaceutical and an inter-laboratory comparison was conducted to evaluate the consistency of current analytical methods across various institutions and with current methods from literature. Additionally, for the biodistribution experiments, a radiolabeling of [

conclusionThe inter-laboratory study confirms that impurities caused by radiolysis can be measured accurately across different institutions, ensuring consistency and reliability in clinical diagnostics and therapy, contributing to improved patient safety. Phosphate buffered HPLC-methods showed no significant benefits in quality control. Increased impurities caused by radiolysis lead to lower tumor-to-kidney ratios, with a decrease in specific tumor binding.

Indexed as

Lu-177PSMA-I&TQuality controlRadiochemical purity (RCP)RadiolysisRadiopharmaceutical implementationTargeted radionuclide therapy (TRT)

Identifiers

PMID41474511
PMCPMC12864547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.