ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
Development and validation of a deep learning-based model for predicting prostate cancer in patients with gray-zone PSA levels: a comparative study with clinician observations.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Olfactory Science and Technology in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: From Invertebrate Models to Artificial Intelligence.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to develop and validate a Deep Learning(DL)-based model for detecting Prostate cancer (PCa) in patients with gray-zone PSA levels using multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mp-MRI). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective multi-center study initially reviewed data from 1778 patients with suspected prostate lesions who presented at multiple hospitals between December 2015 and October 2023. The DL algorithm was trained on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. The performance of the algorithm was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and compared to the diagnostic performance of radiologists with varying levels of expertise.
resultsThe final study cohort comprised 274 patients, who were divided into training, validation, and test sets in a 6:2:2 ratio, corresponding to 162, 56, and 56 patients, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 71.8 years, and the cohort included 90 patients with prostate cancer and 184 without. The multi-attribute Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84, surpassing individual ADC and T2WI models. It also outperformed a transformer-based model (AUC 0.79). When compared to radiologists, the DL model performed similarly to experienced radiologists (AUC 0.86) and outperformed less experienced radiologists (AUC 0.71).
conclusionsThe multimodal CNNs, integrating ADC and T2WI data, demonstrated high accuracy for PCa detection in patients with gray-zone PSA levels, comparable to senior radiologists. This model can aid clinical decision-making, assist in challenging cases, and help reduce unnecessary biopsies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41474500What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.