ReviewDrugs & aging2026
Implants to Treat Glaucoma: Promising or Not?
Review in Drugs & aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of blindness and its prevalence increases with age. The most common form, primary open-angle glaucoma, is a chronic, slowly progressive optic neuropathy characterised by the loss of retinal ganglion cells and their axons, leading to irreversible visual field loss. Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is the only modifiable risk factor for glaucoma. Reducing IOP to a level that is safe for the patient's eye has been shown to slow disease progression. Lowering IOP in open-angle glaucoma is achieved by eye drops, selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) and/or surgery. Many patients are treated with IOP-lowering eye drops, which require lifelong continuous instillation. However, as with other chronic, asymptomatic diseases, adherence to glaucoma treatment is poor for various reasons and is associated with faster disease progression. The purpose of this review is to discuss several sustained-release systems that have been investigated to reduce IOP over time, to address barriers to adherence and improve quality of life. Among these, non-invasive drug-eluting delivery systems such as contact lenses, punctal plugs, and conjunctival ocular inserts have not reached the market. Currently, only two intracameral implants have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for single use due to corneal safety issues. The biodegradable bimatoprost implant releases the drug continuously for 4-6 months, and its effect on IOP may extend for up to 2 years in 25% of patients. The non-biodegradable intracameral implant releases travoprost for 36 months, when it needs to be removed. However, additional data are needed to assess safety following repeated administration, as well as in broader patient populations and in combination with other treatment approaches such as SLT. Several other biodegradable intracameral implants that release prostaglandin analogues are undergoing clinical trials. In the future, intraocular implants containing genetically modified cells that secrete neurotrophic factors may potentially offer an IOP-independent neuroprotective strategy, complementing existing IOP-lowering implants in glaucoma management.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.