ArticleCVIR endovascular2025
A novel intravascular navigational ultrasound system for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedures.
Article in CVIR endovascular, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsTransjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an effective method for reducing portal hypertension in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. However, portal vein puncture is associated with a steep learning curve. Conventional "blind" puncture methods are often imprecise, carry a high risk of complications, and require significant radiation exposure. To increase puncture accuracy, we developed an intravascular navigational ultrasound (IVNU) system. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of IVNU for portal vein puncture during TIPS procedures.
methodsIn the in vitro experiment, we performed punctures using IVNU in four isolated porcine livers. Subsequently, in the in vivo animal study, eight Bama swine (Sus scrofa) were randomly assigned to undergo TIPS using either IVNU (experimental group) or conventional "blind" puncture with the RUPS100 COOK kit (control group).
resultsIn our in vitro experiment, the IVNU system successfully punctured each lobe. In our in vivo study, all the procedures successfully established portosystemic shunts. The IVNU group exhibited significantly fewer punctures (1.8 ± 0.4 vs. 4.2 ± 1.1), shorter procedure times (32.5 ± 4.2 min vs. 58.7 ± 6.5 min), shorter fluoroscopy times (8.1 ± 1.3 min vs. 20.4 ± 2.1 min), and lower radiation doses (579.5 ± 45.9 mGy vs. 1305.7 ± 50.4 mGy) than the control group (all P < 0.01). Puncture-related complications were also significantly reduced in the IVNU group.
conclusionsThese findings indicate that IVNU significantly improves portal vein targeting success, reduces the risk of puncture-related complications and radiation exposure, and decreases procedure time, offering clinicians an optimized solution for TIPS creation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.