ArticleCVIR endovascular2025
Emergency embolization of acute hemorrhage: cone-beam computed tomography with advanced planning and guidance software-a systematic review and case series.
Article in CVIR endovascular, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluates the current evidence on the use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) combined with advanced planning and guidance (APG) software in transarterial embolization for acute hemorrhage and reviews our institution's preliminary experience of use in emergency settings.
methodsA systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, SCOPUS, and Embase were searched to identify studies using CBCT with software for transarterial embolization of hemorrhage. Inclusion criteria focused on studies utilizing CBCT and APG software for hemorrhage management, with data extracted on demographics, hemorrhage locations, equipment/software specifications, technical success and procedural metrics. Additionally, we report a single-center review of patient outcomes using CBCT with multi-organ APG software (EmboASSIST with Virtual Injection, GE HealthCare, Chicago, IL, USA).
resultsNine studies met the inclusion criteria, including 71 patients. The most common site of bleeding was the lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract (62%). The mean technical success rate of embolization utilizing CBCT with APG was 94.3% (range: 82-100%). Three studies reported procedure time (mean 98.9 min, range 50-146 min), and two studies reported fluoroscopy time (mean 27.1 min, range 25-29.1 min). In our initial experience, all six cases were technically successful with favorable outcomes.
conclusionsCBCT with APG software is a feasible and effective tool for hemorrhage embolization in emergency settings. Its potential ability to improve bleeding detection compared to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) may lead to reduced procedure time, lower radiation exposure, and enhanced patient outcomes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: NIHR-PROSPERO CRD 42024619227.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.