ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2026
A Novel and Simple Score to Predict Embolic or Atherosclerotic Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Before Mechanical Thrombectomy: AHOC Score.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Novel and Simple Score to Predict Embolic or Atherosclerotic Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Before Mechanical Thrombectomy: AHOC Score.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe mechanical thrombectomy (MT) strategy obviously differs for acute middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) stroke caused by embolism or atherosclerosis. Our study aimed to develop and validate a simple and universally applicable score for predicting etiology [embolism or intracranial arteriosclerosis (ICAS)] before MT in patients with acute MCAO stroke.
methodsBetween November 2019 and September 2022, we retrospectively enrolled eligible patients in our hospital as the training cohort. Additionally, consecutive patients between July 2023 and April 2024 were recruited as the validation cohort. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent factors associated with etiology in the training group. Each factor was then point assigned based on β-coefficient, and a risk scoring system was developed. The scoring system was validated through the validation cohort. The C-statistic, Brier score, and Hosmer-Lemeshow test were used to assess model discrimination and calibration.
resultsThe training group and validation group finally included 277 patients (154 embolism-MCAO and 123 ICAS-MCAO) and 101 patients (59 embolism-MCAO and 42 ICAS-MCAO), respectively. A scoring system (AHOC score) covering four variables (atrial fibrillation, hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign, stenosis/occlusion in other arteries, and collateral status) was derived to help identify embolism-MCAO or ICAS-MCAO. The AHOC score showed good discrimination and calibration in the training cohort (C-statistic, 0.932 [0.902-0.963]; Brier score, 0.092 [0.070-0.115]; p value of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, 0.604) and in the validation cohort (C-statistic, 0.933 [0.888-0.978]; Brier score, 0.102 [0.067-0.140]; p value of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, 0.846). According to the AHOC score, patients with a score of 4-8 were identified as high-risk for the embolism-MCAO category. Conversely, a patient with a score of 0-3 was considered high-risk for the ICAS-MCAO category.
conclusionsOur scoring system (AHOC score), consisting of atrial fibrillation, hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign, stenosis/occlusion in other arteries and collateral status, is a valid and applicable model for predicting the etiology in patients with acute MCAO before MT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.