Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41474166›Full record

ArticleDeveloping world bioethics2026

Informed Consent as a Human Right in the Inter-American Human Rights System (IAHRS).

Diana Rocío Bernal-Camargo, Ana Isabel Gómez-Córdoba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developing world bioethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Diana Rocío Bernal-CamargoUniversidad del Rosario, Facultad de Jurisprudencia, GI en Derechos Humanos, Bogotá DC, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-9345-2193
Ana Isabel Gómez-CórdobaUniversidad del Rosario, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, GI en Educación Médica y en Ciencias de la Salud, Bogotá DC, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-6328-917X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Informed consent is presented as a fundamental right and principle in modern medical practice. It involves obtaining permission from a patient before any medical procedure, treatment, or research protocol. Although not explicitly recognized as a standalone right in international human rights instruments, informed consent in healthcare is considered a right derived from other rights, such as the rights to health and freedom. The jurisprudence of international human rights courts has permitted the reinterpretation of informed consent beyond just a bioethical principle. This article argues for the normative recognition of informed consent as a self-standing human right, rather than simply a derivative right or an ethical guideline. It does this by analyzing related cases from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights to demonstrate how its jurisprudence, though often linking informed consent to related rights like health, personal integrity, and self-determination, supports an understanding of informed consent as a distinct and fundamental right. The source also mentions that its recognition as a right in fundamental laws, such as the Colombian Constitution, should be achieve through the application of these international standards or via the concept of emerging rights.

Indexed as

Human RightsInformed ConsentInternational CooperationRight to HealthColombiaHumansPersonal AutonomyUnited Statesautonomycase lawhuman rightinformed consent

Identifiers

PMID41474166
PMCPMC12980556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.