ArticleMedical physics2026
Dose optimization with fully flexible vertex positioning for LATTICE radiotherapy.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of lattice radiation therapy using a noncoplanar vertex arrangement and dynamic conformal arcs.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Exploratory personalized radiobiological modeling of bystander and immune effects to inform SFRT-SBRT scheduling.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Photon minibeam-based LATTICE radiotherapy for small and medium-sized tumors: A dosimetric planning study.Medical physics · 2026Article
- A single-field-each-peak optimization method for motion-robust proton LATTICE therapy.Medical physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLattice radiotherapy (LATTICE) is a technique of spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) that delivers high radiation doses to specific regions (vertices) within a large tumor, forming a spatially modulated "lattice" pattern, while surrounding areas receive lower doses to minimize damage to healthy tissues. Although the original conception of LATTICE did not prescribe any rigorous symmetry, and early clinical implementations relied on manual vertex placement tailored to tumor shape and anatomical constraints, more recent automated approaches have introduced regular patterns such as simple cubic or hexagonal arrangements. These rigid configurations, while convenient, may reduce the flexibility needed to accommodate irregular tumor geometries and nearby critical structures, potentially resulting in unintended hotspots or under-treatment. Optimizing the placement of vertices in LATTICE is beneficial for precisely targeting high-dose regions within the tumor while minimizing radiation exposure to adjacent healthy tissue, but there is still no optimization method available for solving the positions of fully flexible placed vertices. The great challenge in such optimization lies in handling the constraints on the relative positions between different vertices. PURPOSE: This work aims to develop a new treatment planning method for LATTICE with fully flexible placement of vertices and simultaneous optimization of the position of each lattice vertex and dose, to improve overall plan quality compared with conventional LATTICE planning methods relying on manual regular placements of lattice vertices.
methodsThe proposed method simultaneously optimizes each lattice vertex position and other plan optimization variables (proton spot weights or photon fluences) during the dose optimization process. This is formulated as a new constrained optimization problem by adding each lattice vertex position to optimization variables with appropriate constraints to meet the requirements of the LATTICE vertices placement guideline on the 1) center-to-center distance between lattice vertices and 2) distance of lattice vertices to the target boundaries. The optimization problem is solved by the alternating direction method of multipliers and iterative convex relaxation methods.
resultsPlans generated using our proposed method (NEW) were compared with conventional LATTICE plans for two representative patient cases presented in the main manuscript: one abdominal and one lung tumor. To maintain brevity, two additional patient cases are included in the Supporting Information to further demonstrate the performance and generalizability of the proposed method. For each case, we generated 100 LATTICE plans with varying vertex positions. From these, three plans-termed BEST, MID, and WORST-were selected based on the largest, median, and smallest total optimization objective value
conclusionA new LATTICE treatment planning approach is introduced, in which lattice positions are fully flexible and optimized simultaneously with dose distribution, leading to improved target PVDR and OAR sparing compared to conventional LATTICE methods with regularly spaced vertices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.