ArticlePsychophysiology2026
Temporal Stability of Neural Markers of Motivated and Voluntary Attention: Case-by-Case and Group Analyses.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Temporal Stability of Neural Markers of Motivated and Voluntary Attention: Case-by-Case and Group Analyses.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is growing evidence that electrophysiological markers of selective attention can be reliably assessed at the level of the individual case. The present study extends this work by examining their temporal stability across a one-week retest interval, with a focus on motivated and voluntary attention. Seventeen healthy young adults were tested twice, 1 week apart, using a dense sensor EEG setup. Each session included blocks featuring either highly arousing erotic or mutilation images alongside low-arousing control stimuli. To simultaneously assess voluntary attention, participants performed an emotion categorization task in which high or low arousal images served as targets in separate blocks. Across both emotion categories, the majority of participants showed significant emotional modulation of the EPN (88%) and LPP (100%) components, as well as target P3 effects (76%) in both sessions. Complementary classification approaches based on different significance thresholds further supported the consistency of these effects. Subsampling analyses revealed that although reducing trial numbers diminished reliability, robust effects, particularly for the EPN and LPP in response to erotic stimuli, remained detectable at moderate trial counts. Analyses at the group level revealed excellent test-retest reliabilities for the EPN (ICC > 0.91) and target P3 (ICC > 0.86). While reliability was good for the LPP (ICC > 0.60), the confidence intervals indicated substantial variability. Together, these findings demonstrate that neural correlates of both motivated and voluntary attention exhibit high test-retest reliability at the individual level, reinforcing their utility as biomarkers and highlighting the value of single-case analyses in electrophysiological research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.