ArticleMedical physics2026
Beyond mechanics: Maximum-likelihood-driven PET detector alignment calibration.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncertainty-aware gamma interaction localization and reconstruction in PET.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Beyond mechanics: Maximum-likelihood-driven PET detector alignment calibration.Medical physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate quantification is a cornerstone of positron-emission tomography (PET), yet mechanical inaccuracies during detector assembly continue to undermine this goal. Deviations from intended design geometries arise due to factors such as manufacturing tolerances, mechanical stress, and cumulative errors during module installation and operation. High-resolution PET systems, in particular, are highly susceptible to even minor misalignments, such as translational offsets of PURPOSE: To address the limitations imposed by mechanical misalignments in PET systems, particularly in high-resolution applications, we propose a calibration strategy that eliminates reliance on precise physical assembly or movable calibration setups. The goal is to develop a data-driven framework for estimating detector alignment parameters directly from PET measurements, allowing for robust recalibration across a broad range of scanner geometries and detector designs.
methodsWe present a statistical optimization framework that estimates detector alignment parameters directly from time-of-flight list-mode coincidence data using gradient-based optimization. By casting the problem as a maximum likelihood estimation conditioned on a known 3D tracer distribution, the optimization targets to maximize the Poisson likelihood of the measured coincidence data under the parametrized alignment model. This formulation eliminates the need for any movable parts, including motion stages, rotating sources, or manual calibration efforts. The approach supports complex extended tracer distributions and generic scanner geometries, enabling a flexible, regular, software-based recalibration from static acquisitions.
resultsThe method was validated on both simulated and real PET systems, including measurements with point sources and a tracer-filled tube phantom. In the simulation study, deviations from a cylindrical configuration were introduced prior to data generation, while the cylindrical geometry was used as initialization for the optimization. For the point source setup, alignment parameters were recovered with an accuracy of approximately
conclusionsThis framework bridges hardware imperfections and quantitative fidelity by enabling robust recalibration in mechanically unstable or mobile settings. It is compatible with diverse phantom types and scanner topologies, and operates effectively even in the absence of precise scanner-phantom alignment. By reducing dependency on strict manufacturing tolerances while preserving an accurate line of response positioning, our approach offers a practical and scalable solution for modern PET calibration, where quantitative accuracy is paramount.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.