ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2026
Detection of Early Knee Osteoarthritis Using Multi-Component T
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early Knee Osteoarthritis Detection by Multi-Component TBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly detection of knee osteoarthritis (OA) is important. Spin-lattice relaxation in the rotating frame (T PURPOSE: To evaluate if stretched- (SE) and bi-exponential (BE) T STUDY TYPE: Case-control study. POPULATION: Twenty-six healthy subjects (mean age 51.5) and 26 early knee OA patients (mean age 61.8). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: T ASSESSMENT: T STATISTICAL TESTS: Parameters were adjusted for age. Mann-Whitney U-test (group comparisons), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) with bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (CI). Significance level set at p < 0.05, using the false discovery rate (FDR) to correct for multiple comparisons.
resultsIn the global analysis, no model demonstrated significant diagnostic performance (p-values of 0.63, 0.96, 0.63 for ME, SE, and BE). Multi-regional SE model (AUC = 0.83, CI: 0.72, 0.93) significantly distinguished OA and healthy groups. Calibration analysis showed the SE model had the lowest Brier score (0.17), significantly better than the ME model (0.26). DATA
conclusionSub-regional analysis of T EVIDENCE LEVEL: 4. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.