[Estimating and evaluating usual total fat and fatty acid intake in the Korean population using data from the 2019-2021 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys: a cross-sectional study].

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Nutritional risk assessment using estimated usual nutrient intake in Korean adults: analysis of the 8th (2019-2021) Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data.Nutrition research and practice · 2025
   Article
2. Dietary intake and food sources of essential fatty acids among Korean adolescents: a cross-sectional study based on the 2016-2021 KNHANES data.Korean journal of community nutrition · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.