ReviewAmerican journal of medicine open2025
The Impact of Different Antidiabetic Drugs on Fracture Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With a Focus on SGLT2 Inhibitors.
Review in American journal of medicine open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Irisin upregulation as a contributory mechanism for the therapeutic benefits of SGLT-2 inhibitors.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Review
- SGLT2 Inhibitors: Dual Effects on Erythropoiesis and Bone Metabolism.Journal of bone metabolism · 2026Review
- Research progress on the pathophysiological mechanisms of pioglitazone-induced heart failure: a review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
SGLT2 inhibitors are a new class of antidiabetic drugs that have shown cardiovascular benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cardiovascular disease. However, their effects on fracture risk are unclear and may depend on the type and duration of treatment. This meta-analysis compares the fracture risk of different antidiabetic drugs, including SGLT2 inhibitors, based on data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched 4 databases for RCTs that reported fracture events in patients with T2DM who received different antidiabetic drugs. We included 117 RCTs that compared 9 types of antidiabetic drugs: SGLT2 inhibitors, DPP-4 inhibitors, α-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, insulin, GLP-1 receptor agonists, meglitinides, biguanides, and sulfonylureas. We used a statistical method called Frequentist meta-analysis to combine data from different studies and compare different treatments. The results showed that SGLT2 inhibitors were the only drug that significantly reduced the fracture risk compared to placebo and other drugs (OR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.98). The other antidiabetic drugs did not show any significant difference from placebo or from each other. The mechanisms behind the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on bone health are not well understood and may involve changes in calcium, phosphate, sodium, and arginine vasopressin levels in the body. SGLT2 inhibitors demonstrated a favorable skeletal safety profile among antidiabetic drugs. More long-term studies focused on fracture as a primary outcome are needed to fully understand how SGLT2 inhibitors affect bone health and fracture risk in patients with T2DM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.