ArticleClinical case reports2026
Incidental Diagnosis of Fahr's Disease Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Case Report.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Incidental Diagnosis of Fahr's Disease Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fahr's disease is a rare idiopathic neurodegenerative disorder characterized by symmetrical calcifications in the basal ganglia and cerebellar dentate nuclei. Although it may present with diverse neuropsychiatric symptoms, a significant number of cases remain asymptomatic and are only identified incidentally through neuroimaging performed for unrelated medical issues. We present a case of a 43-year-old woman who was brought to the emergency department following a high-impact motor vehicle accident. Brain CT, performed as part of trauma assessment, revealed extensive findings consistent with severe traumatic brain injury, including cerebral edema, contusions, cisternal compression, and skull base fractures. Incidentally, bilateral symmetrical calcifications were noted in the basal ganglia and dentate nuclei-findings unrelated to acute trauma. Subsequent metabolic and endocrine evaluation ruled out secondary causes, confirming a diagnosis of Fahr's disease. This case highlights the diagnostic importance of incidental neuroimaging findings in the acute trauma setting. Although often overshadowed by life-threatening injuries, such calcifications warrant further evaluation to distinguish Fahr's disease from secondary calcification due to metabolic or infectious etiologies. Recognizing Fahr's disease is essential, as it carries implications for long-term neurological surveillance, genetic counseling, and family screening. It is worth mentioning that there is ongoing controversy regarding the most appropriate terminology for this condition, including terms such as Primary Familial Brain Calcification (PFBC) and Primary Bilateral Brain Calcification (PBBC), each of which has its own advantages and limitations. In conclusion, incidental detection of Fahr's disease during emergency neuroimaging emphasizes the need for clinical vigilance and a thorough diagnostic approach, even in critical care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.