ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Improved early recovery and shorter hospital stay with fast track protocol versus standard care in total hip arthroplasty: 5-year results from a prospective randomised controlled study.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of fast-track surgical management for acute orthopedic fractures: a retrospective cohort analysis.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Early-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of a new short cementless stem for primary total hip arthroplasty in young and active patients.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Highly accurate component placement does not improve patient-reported outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: A computerised tomography-based study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Improved early recovery and shorter hospital stay with fast track protocol versus standard care in total hip arthroplasty: 5-year results from a prospective randomised controlled study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a widely performed surgery with growing demand globally. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a fast track (FT) protocol compared to standard care (SC) in patients undergoing THA. Methods: Ninety patients aged 18-70 years with primary unilateral hip osteoarthritis, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score <3, body mass index (BMI) ≤ 32 and no cognitive or psychiatric disorders were prospectively enrolled from March 2018 to January 2020. All patients provided informed consent and were randomised to the FT or SC groups. The FT protocol consisted of preoperative education, oral analgesic pain management and early intensive rehabilitation. Functional autonomy was assessed on postoperative Day 3 using the Iowa Level of Assistance (ILOA) scale. Follow-up assessments at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 60 months included the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Results: Forty-six patients were assigned to the FT group. Both groups were comparable in baseline demographics. The FT group showed significantly faster early functional recovery, with lower ILOA scores on postoperative Day 3 (9.60 ± 5.2 vs. 11.7 ± 3.4; Conclusions: The FT protocol enhances early postoperative recovery and significantly reduces hospital stay after THA without compromising safety. Long-term functional outcomes favour the FT approach, supporting its implementation to improve recovery in appropriately selected patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. Level of Evidence: Level II.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.