ReviewBioactive materials2026
Fibrin scaffolds for angiogenesis in soft tissue models: a systematic review.
Review in Bioactive materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- BMP-7 mRNA delivered by Fibrin-CaP scaffolds activates osteogenic programs in vivo as evidenced by transcriptomic and proteomic analyses.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- From microbubbles to macro-control: Linking ultrasound-induced microarchitecture to precise drug release kinetics from acoustically responsive scaffolds.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2026Article
- Natural Polymers in Tissue Engineering and Regeneration: Material-Cell Mechanotransduction, Biofabrication Strategies, and Clinical Translation.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Fibrinogen and Fibrin as Growth Factor Regulators: Pathological Implications, and Translational Opportunities.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Fibrin scaffolds for angiogenesis in soft tissue models: a systematic review.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fibrin is a biocompatible, angiogenic biomaterial widely used in soft tissue engineering, with outcomes influenced by scaffold formulation and design. Aim: This systematic review evaluates how fibrin scaffold composition and design affect angiogenesis in Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and OVID were searched on 28/Oct/2024. A two-step screening process by three independent researchers identified original studies on fibrin scaffolds assessing endothelial formation and/or migration. Studies without experimental data or focused solely on grafts were excluded. Data on scaffold composition, manufactured objects, cell-embedding strategies, angiogenic outcomes, and a subset of muscle-specific studies were narratively synthesised. Risk of bias (RoB) and study quality were assessed using SYRCLE's RoB tool and a modified CAMARADES checklist. Results & discussion: The 81 studies highlight the impact of scaffold composition on angiogenic outcomes, with human-derived fibrinogen and pre-embedding cells consistently supporting successful outcomes. While tube and network formation outcomes typically aligned, endothelial migration exhibited different patterns. Thrombin often contributed positively, but crosslinker effects were less clear. Muscle-focused studies mainly used hydrogels and often included non-endothelial cells. Conclusions: Fibrin scaffolds are highly relevant for soft tissue engineering, with outcomes influenced by formulation, fibrinogen source, and cell embedding. However, experimental design variability and lack of standardised reporting hinder reproducibility and clinical translation. To support future research, a minimum information checklist was created to promote consistent reporting, while aggregated success rates across design parameters could guide scaffold design. Registration & funding: PROSPERO [CRD42025612994] and OSF [10.17605/osf.io/nvfdj]. No funding body was directly involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.