Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41473804›Full record

ArticleACS central science2025

Atmospheric Sampling Mass Spectrometers Activate and Ionize Neutral Water Microdroplets to MeV Energies and up to 200,000+ Charges: Implications for Water Stability and Unusual Chemistry in Microdroplets.

Matthew S McPartlan, Casey J Chen, Conner C Harper, Zachary M Miller, Julian Robles, Veena S Avadhani, Randall E Pedder, Luke J Metzler, Evan R Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS central science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Droplet-on-demand mass spectrometry reveals curvature-dependent interfacial reactivity in aqueous microdroplets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Matthew S McPartlanDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1460, United States.
Casey J ChenDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1460, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0945-9670
Conner C HarperDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1460, United States.
Zachary M MillerDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1460, United States.
Julian RoblesDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1460, United States.
Veena S AvadhaniDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1460, United States.
Randall E PedderArdara Technologies LP, Ardara, Pennsylvania 15615, United States.
Luke J MetzlerArdara Technologies LP, Ardara, Pennsylvania 15615, United States.
Evan R WilliamsDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1460, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1733-3018

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutral water microdroplets formed by condensation were introduced into a mass spectrometer with a standard stainless-steel capillary atmospheric interface. Placing volatile samples near the mass spectrometer inlet led to spectra comparable to those of electrospray ionization of the same compounds. Neutral microdroplets introduced into a charge detection instrument through a nearly identical atmospheric sampling interface resulted in charged microdroplets with diameters between 165 nm (∼3,000 charge detection threshold) and 2.8 μm (200,000+ charges). The vast majority of 100,000+ aqueous microdroplets analyzed were positively charged. Aerodynamic acceleration led to average velocities of ∼270 m/s and ∼210 m/s for the smallest and largest microdroplets, respectively, with corresponding energies ranging from a few MeV to 300+ MeV for the largest microdroplets. Current measured on the capillary and other results indicate that interactions between the neutral microdroplets and the capillary can strip off hundreds of thousands of electrons to form positively charged droplets. Negatively charged microdroplets indicate a minor process in which neutral microdroplets are broken up into smaller microdroplets of both polarities. The MeV+ energy involved in these interactions is sufficient to drive many chemical reactions and may lead to unusual and unexpected chemistry when analysis is done using mass spectrometers with atmospheric sampling interfaces.

Identifiers

PMID41473804
PMCPMC12746156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.