ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
"Oh my word, so overwhelmed": Exploring the patient and family experience with diagnosis and treatment decision-making in pediatric CNS tumors.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors are the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in children, with survival outcomes significantly influenced by racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities. These disparities may arise from delayed diagnosis, unequal access to care, and challenges in navigating complex treatment decisions, including clinical trial enrollment. This study explores the experiences of a diverse cohort of families from symptom onset through treatment initiation, focusing on their perspectives on diagnosis, treatment discussions, and decision-making processes. Methods: This qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with families of children diagnosed with pediatric CNS tumors. Transcripts were analyzed by two separate coders using thematic analysis. Results: Four major themes were identified: Experience of diagnosis, Treatment discussion, Treatment decision, and Communication. Families described the emotional toll of diagnosis, marked by uncertainty, shock, and urgency. Many reported difficulties understanding complex medical information and accessing advanced treatment options. Treatment decisions were influenced by perceptions of therapeutic efficacy, anticipated side effects, and available family-level resources. Variations in perceived barriers to care highlighted disparities in support-seeking behaviors, emphasizing the need for personalized communication and tailored resources. Conclusion: This study provides a nuanced understanding of pediatric CNS tumor care by centering patient and family experiences. Findings underscore the need for targeted interventions to improve access to innovative treatments, support informed decision-making, and enhance communication. Future research should incorporate quantitative methods to validate findings and develop scalable solutions that address structural and informational barriers, ultimately reducing disparities and improving family experiences in pediatric CNS tumor care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.