ArticleBioMed research international2025
Functional and Structure Prediction of Hypothetical Proteins From
Article in BioMed research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Functional and Structure Prediction of Hypothetical Proteins FromBioMed research international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: The genome of Results: EUJ18943.1 (136 aa) and EUJ18676.1 (206 aa) are stable, hydrophilic proteins with acidic isoelectric points. BLASTp identified EUJ18943.1 as homologous to Imm48 immunity proteins and EUJ18676.1 as a GyrI-like detoxification protein. Both showed alpha-helix-rich secondary structures, with high-confidence AlphaFold3 models (pTM scores: 0.87 and 0.94). Structural validation confirmed the model quality. Virulence prediction tools classified both as potential virulence factors. Active sites were predicted by PrankWeb and ProBiS, identifying kanamycin A (score: 2.32) and streptomycin (score: 2.10) as top ligands. AutoDock v4.5.6 revealed strong binding affinities ( Conclusion: This study provides the first in silico structural and functional characterization of two HPs from
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.