Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41473724›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Blood bank trends in Kuwait: five-year analysis of donations and investigations.

Dalal Almuaili, Rabaa Abdullah, Anwar M Al-Awadhi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dalal AlmuailiDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, Kuwait University, Jabriya, Kuwait.
Rabaa AbdullahMinistry of Health, Sulaibikhat, Kuwait.
Anwar M Al-AwadhiDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, Kuwait University, Jabriya, Kuwait.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reliable national transfusion services require continuous surveillance of donation activity, inventory losses, transfusion-transmissible infection (TTI) screening, and immunohematology workload. Kuwait's centralized service is coordinated by the Kuwait Central Blood Bank (KCBB). Study design and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of officially requested KCBB annual reports (January 2019-December 2023). Collated variables included donation volumes, donor sex and ABO/RhD distribution, discarded components, and NAT screening outcomes for HBV, HCV, and HIV. Patient-side indicators comprised total immunohematology samples, antibody screening/identification, antenatal testing, and alloantibody profiles. The analysis was descriptive, presenting distributions and temporal trends without inferential testing. Results: Donations averaged ~82,000 annually, with a decline during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021) and recovery to ~85,000 in 2023. Male donors accounted for >85% of donations. O RhD Discussion: KCBB data highlight persistent male predominance among donors, RhD-negative scarcity (8.6%), and variable component wastage, especially FFP. These findings support targeted donor-recruitment strategies, obstetric-transfusion planning for RhD-negative supply, and strengthened inventory management to improve resilience and safety of Kuwait's blood supply.

Indexed as

Blood BanksBlood DonorsCOVID-19FemaleHumansKuwaitMaleRetrospective StudiesAlloantibodiesAntenatal testingBlood utilizationKuwait Central Blood BankTransfusion transmissible infection (TTI)

Identifiers

PMID41473724
PMCPMC12745441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.