ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Inclusive and effective teaching of Nature-Based Social Prescribing for allied health professional students within digital environments.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digital social prescribing: a concept analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nature-based Social Prescribing is increasingly relevant to Allied Health Professionals in the UK, requiring educators to impart foundational knowledge on public health, health equity and nature connection. There is limited guidance on effective pedagogy and assessment strategies for inclusive and effective NbSP education, especially regarding contemporary approaches such as digital and mixed reality environments. Methods: This seminal mixed-methods integrative study employed Group Concept Mapping with thirty-eight stakeholders to explore perspectives on critical content ideas for NbSP training, pedagogical development and preferred learning environments for AHPs. Stakeholder input informed the identification of potential checklist items for curriculum design and effective classroom practice in-person and digitally. Results: Stakeholders emphasized forty out of one hundred statements as highly relevant for course design, content creation and the development of inclusive and effective teaching approaches for NbSP. Key findings highlighted the necessity of bringing students into nature and fostering direct nature connection alongside contributing to community organizations to understand more roles, in addition to traditional teaching methods. Opportunities to enhance higher education inclusivity were identified. Discussion: This study is the first to apply Group Concept Mapping to NbSP pedagogy for AHPs, offering initial insights for future curriculum design and assessment in this field. Further research is warranted to support educators in delivering inclusive and effective NbSP education, particularly in evolving digital and hybrid learning contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.