ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Exploring the implementation and theory of a school-based diet and active lifestyle intervention among primary school children.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of the Implementation of Combined Physical Activity and Nutrition Programmes in Schools: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Guided by Kincaid's ideation metatheory, the Promoting hEalthy Diet and Active Lifestyle (PEDAL), a school-based intervention, was developed. The central tenets of ideation consist of three psychosocial domains (cognitive, emotional, and social) that are assumed to influence behavior cumulatively. This study explored the implementation of two components of PEDAL and how ideation factors influenced diet and active lifestyle behaviors. Methods: Following the conduct of two out of four intervention components (a series of interactive in-class lessons and actionable home activities), six focus group discussions were conducted with students ( Results: While students enjoyed the lessons and home activities, they hoped that lessons could be more physically active. Teachers found lessons easy to implement but struggled with time constraints. Students reported gaining a better understanding of sedentary behaviors and habit formation through the lessons. However, they faced barriers, such as COVID-19 movement restrictions and the lack of autonomy at home, which impeded their opportunities to engage in more physical activity and healthier eating. Regarding ideation, students discussed cognitive factors that motivated behavior change, such as attitudes toward healthier behaviors and image concerns. Emotional factors, including the enjoyment of activities, influenced students' motivation to engage in healthy eating and physical activity. Some students also reported resistance to further changes when they felt they were already "doing too much." Social factors, such as family involvement, were critical but often limited. Conclusion: The findings have illuminated several crucial aspects of enhancing intervention implementation, supported the use of the ideation metatheory to underpin the PEDAL intervention, and guided the subsequent evaluation of the whole intervention. This study was retrospectively registered with the ISRCTN registry [ISRCTN16114046].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.