ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
A more detailed park prescription: How does landscape support human health behavior?
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The role of urban parks in promoting public health is continuously evolving. For time-pressed urban residents, knowing the specific locations within parks that support various health behaviors can help them use these spaces more effectively for their daily usage. This study attempts to develop an analytical framework at the plot scale, using a 30*30 m grid as the basic unit, to assess the intensity of health behaviors driven by different landscape characteristics within parks. Methods: To investigate these relationships, seven representative urban parks in Shanghai were selected, with 68 standard-sized plots established as sampling sites. Firstly, computer vision-based semantic segmentation was employed to measure the landscape features within these spots. This was combined with systematic behavioral observation and coding to quantify the intensity of three types of health behaviors-exercise, leisure, and social activities-at each measurement spot. Subsequently, regression analysis was used to construct a model defining the relationship between landscape characteristics and health behavior intensity. This model was then applied to predict and visualize the intensity of health behaviors across the entire park area. Results: Results show that sky visibility, pavement coverage, and the presence of rough or uneven ground are significant predictors of the overall intensity of health-related behaviors in the studied plots. More specifically, trees, pavements, rough or uneven ground and resting facilities are closely associated with the intensity of exercise behavior, while shrubs primarily affect the intensity of leisurely behaviors. Mapping the intensity of health-related behaviors in Fuxing Park revealed that spaces for leisurely activities overlap with those for the other two types of health-related activities, whereas exercise and social behaviors exhibit spatial exclusivity. Discussion: Ultimately, the resulting visualizations, which map the distribution and intensity of different health behaviors, thereby serve a dual purpose. Firstly, they enable users to promptly locate areas within parks that are suitable for specific health-promoting activities, thereby helping to prevent potential conflicts between different types of behaviors. Secondly, by establishing clear relationships between plot-level landscape features and observed health behaviors, the framework provides park managers with an evidence-based tool for optimizing the allocation of environmental resources to support diverse recreational needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.