ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Patient safety culture assessment in five public hospitals of Sichuan Province: a cross-sectional study with HSOPSC 2.0.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient safety is a core issue in the medical field, influenced by patient safety culture (PSC). Research on PSC in southwestern China remains insufficient. Methods: This study is a cross-sectional survey. A convenience sample of healthcare workers from five hospitals in Sichuan Province was surveyed during January to March 2025. The Chinese version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture 2.0 was used to assess participants' perceptions of PSC. SPSS 22.0 was used for data analysis, including descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, Results: This study collected 468 valid questionnaires. Among the participants, the majority were female (91.2%) and nurses (80.3%). The overall average positive response rate for PSC was 69.4%. Five dimensions were identified as strengths, with positive response rates ranging from 75.4 to 83.4%: "Communication about error," "organizational learning-continuous improvement," "team work," "support for patient safety," and "handoffs and information exchange." In contrast, four dimensions required improvement (positive response rates: 51.5-71.2%), including "staffing and work pace," "response to error," "reporting patient safety events," and "communication openness." Notably, the positive response rate for "reporting patient safety events" was 53.1%, which was significantly lower than the 76.0% reported by AHRQ in 2024. Univariate analysis demonstrated statistically significant associations between safety culture scores and several variables, including working hours per week, work unit, adverse event reporting frequency, and self-reported overall patient safety ratings ( Conclusion: Our study reveals that the patient safety culture among healthcare professionals in Sichuan Province is at a moderate level, has not reached the expected standard. Notably, there exist significant gaps in critical domains, such as patient safety events reporting, when compared with developed regions, which underscores the imbalance in medical safety concepts across different regions. Future efforts should focus on establishing non-punitive reporting and learning mechanisms, optimize the allocation of human resources and clinical workflows, and ultimately foster a more robust and advanced PSC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.