ArticleAdvanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.)2025
Bio-Archive of Cultural Heritage Microbiomes for Sustainable Conservation in the Multi-Omics Era.
Article in Advanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Filamentous Fungi and the Biodeterioration of Organic Cultural Heritage Materials: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms, Risks, and Preventive Conservation Strategies.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Bio-Archive of Cultural Heritage Microbiomes for Sustainable Conservation in the Multi-Omics Era.Advanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cultural heritage sites are commonly exposed to outdoor environments, resulting in severe damage to heritage objects from biotic and abiotic processes. Control of outdoor environments is impossible for heritage conservation, and we cannot prevent the abiotic processes. However, a variety of mitigation management can be developed for biotic damage, such as microbial colonization and biodeterioration. Over the past few decades, both conventional cultivation-dependent and modern cultivation-independent techniques have been employed to elucidate the microbiomes associated with the biodeterioration of cultural heritage. However, many studies are limited to segmentary analyses or simply stop at examining the community composition of the microbiomes, lacking solid evidence of microbial metabolism and biochemical reactions between microorganisms and heritage materials to support the core microbiomes associated with the biodeterioration. Here, we recommend thoroughly exploring the benefits of more advanced multi-omics techniques for analyzing cultural heritage microbiomes. We propose establishing a professional open-access database to standardize analytical procedures, integrating both culture-dependent and culture-independent approaches, and bio-archive valuable information on the core microbiomes, including their biodeterioration mechanisms, timelines, causes, and environmental conditions. This bio-archive of cultural heritage microbiomes will empower conservators and researchers worldwide to develop evidence-based, sustainable approaches for cultural heritage conservation under environmental change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.