Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41473648›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Bilateral Vertebral Artery Dissections Associated With Postpartum Preeclampsia: A Case Report.

Alexandra C Dadrat, Vittoria Costantino, Rolando J De Leon

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexandra C DadratObstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, USA.
Vittoria CostantinoPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Rolando J De LeonObstetrics and Gynecology, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postpartum vertebral artery dissections (VADs) are infrequently reported; although data are limited, several case reports describe VAD occurring in the setting of postpartum preeclampsia. We present a 39-year-old G3P3003 (P1 term stillbirth) who developed bilateral VADs in the setting of postpartum preeclampsia and a persistent, nonfocal occipital headache. Six days after an uncomplicated cesarean delivery, the patient developed an unrelenting occipital headache accompanied by severe-range blood pressures. She met diagnostic criteria for postpartum preeclampsia. Despite treatment with magnesium sulfate and antihypertensives, her headache persisted. On postpartum day 9, she developed new neck pain in addition to her headache. Computed tomography angiography revealed bilateral VADs. She was initiated on dual antiplatelet therapy, systemic anticoagulation, and strict blood pressure control. Her neurologic examination remained nonfocal throughout admission. Over subsequent days, her blood pressure normalized and her headache improved. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of evaluating postpartum headaches and underscores the importance of ongoing reassessment rather than anchoring to an initial diagnosis. It also raises the question of whether VAD precipitates hypertensive episodes or whether postpartum preeclampsia contributes to arterial injury.

Indexed as

arterial dissection in pregnancypostpartum headachepostpartum preeclampsiapreeclampsiavertebral artery dissection

Identifiers

PMID41473648
PMCPMC12747585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.