Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41473633›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Patient With Small Bowel Obstruction Secondary to an Incarcerated Left Obturator Hernia.

Kabhisha Gunasekaran, Farah Abdul Aziz

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kabhisha GunasekaranAcute Surgical Unit/General Surgery, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, AUS.
Farah Abdul AzizBreast and General Surgery, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, AUS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obturator hernia, an infrequent pelvic hernia, which primarily affects thin elderly women, often leads to intestinal obstruction due to diagnosis delay resulting from the absence of specific symptoms and detectable signs. The delay in diagnosis and surgical intervention contributes to its relatively high morbidity and mortality rates. This case report discusses a woman in her 80s with a non-underweight BMI of 19.9 kg/m2 who experienced small bowel obstruction (SBO) due to an incarcerated left obturator hernia, which was found relatively late at day three post symptoms. The patient had a history of rapid unintentional weight loss, reduced oral intake, as well as symptoms suggestive of bowel obstruction, such as vomiting and obstipation, and was diagnosed preoperatively via Computerized Tomography (CT) imaging findings showing an incarcerated left obturator hernia. This case report presents a unique case of left-sided incarcerated obturator hernia, which is less common compared to right-sided obturator hernia due to anatomical reasons. Surgical intervention involved a mini lower midline laparotomy for the reduction and repair of the obturator hernia, and fortunately, no bowel resection was required due to the viability of bowel intra-operatively despite clinical concern of bowel ischemia due to the delay in surgical intervention resulting from the transfer of the patient from a regional area. Although many cases of obturator hernia are usually diagnosed intra-operatively, in this case report, we highlight the importance of considering the diagnosis of obturator hernia, especially in cases of elderly, thin female patients presenting with bowel obstruction, and to ensure an early pre-operative diagnosis, comprehensive history assessment, meticulous physical examination, and thorough diagnostic procedures, including a CT scan.

Indexed as

elderly patientsfrail elderlyobturator herniassmall-bowel obstructionsurgical repair of hernia

Identifiers

PMID41473633
PMCPMC12747126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.