ArticleCase reports in ophthalmological medicine2025
Secondary Glaucoma Resulting From Choroidal Melanoma in a Patient With Congenital Nevus of Ota.
Article in Case reports in ophthalmological medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Secondary Glaucoma Resulting From Choroidal Melanoma in a Patient With Congenital Nevus of Ota.Case reports in ophthalmological medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: First, to report nevus of Ota accompanying ocular melanoma in Thai patients. Second, to report angle-closure glaucoma as a presentation secondary to ocular melanoma along with a pathological report giving insight into the pathophysiology of secondary glaucoma in uveal melanoma. Observations: This case describes a patient with a nevus of Ota who experienced gradual, painless vision loss in the left eye, coinciding with the nevus location. Over 7 months, the patient's vision progressively worsened, culminating in the diagnosis of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Tumor identification was first achieved through fundus examination at a tertiary care center, and the tumor was subsequently confirmed via ocular ultrasonography. The patient elected against eye enucleation. The patient presented again as a secondary angle-closure glaucoma resulting from ocular melanoma. Conclusions and Importance: This case highlighted the importance of a rare malignant tumor that can accompany a nevus of Ota. Patient symptoms can vary from visual loss to a painful eye. Physician must be aware of the disease and include melanoma in the differential diagnosis in patients with a nevus of Ota. Thorough eye examination is important. Ocular ultrasonography is feasible, simple, and crucial for diagnosis. Accurate staging is vital for choosing the correct treatment strategy to save the patient's life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.