ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2025
Diaphragmatic curvature analysis using dynamic digital radiography.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate area under diaphragm (AUD) obtained by dynamic digital radiography (DDR) for the differentiation between normal subjects and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Methods: This retrospective study included healthy volunteers and COPD patients recruited from 2009 to 2014 at Fukujuji Hospital, who received DDR and pulmonary functional test. AUD was defined as an area under a hemidiaphragm and above the line connecting the ipsilateral costophrenic angle to the top of the hemidiaphragm on DDR image. AUD in full inspiration minus AUD in full expiration (ΔAUD) was also calculated. The diaphragmatic surface was demarcated manually on DDR image to calculate AUD. Three-group comparison of AUD and ΔAUD among normal, mild COPD, and severe COPD subjects was tested with one-way analysis of variance, followed by multiple comparison with Tukey-Kramer method. The diagnostic accuracy of COPD by ΔAUD was assessed using receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC) curve. Results: Sixty-eight participants (36 men, 29 COPD patients) were enrolled. AUD in full inspiration was larger in healthy volunteers than in COPD patients (right, p < 0.001; left, p = 0.02). ΔAUD were different in the three-group comparison (right, normal, 208.7 ± 184.6 mm Conclusion: The value of ΔAUD was smaller according to the severity of COPD. ΔAUD can be helpful in distinguishing healthy subjects from COPD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.