ArticleCase reports in neurological medicine2025
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors as Risk Factors for Cerebral Vascular Disease: Report of Two Cases and Literature Review.
Article in Case reports in neurological medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors as Risk Factors for Cerebral Vascular Disease: Report of Two Cases and Literature Review.Case reports in neurological medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), especially nilotinib and ponatinib, has been associated with atheromatic vascular adverse events including cerebrovascular disease. Herein, we present two patients with CML and long-term nilotinib treatment, who developed severe carotid atherosclerotic stenoses, both extra- and intracranial, resulting in ischemic stroke. The clinical and radiological findings as well as the possible pathophysiological mechanisms of these clinically significant complications are discussed. It seems that new-generation TKIs such as nilotinib, ponatinib, and, to a far lesser extent, bosutinib increase the incidence of vascular occlusive events compared to imatinib, in a dose- and duration-dependent manner. The mechanisms leading to vasculopathy are various and comprise promoting a prothrombotic platelet state, the dysregulation of glucose and lipid metabolism, increase of inflammatory cytokines, and affecting vessel wall endothelial cells. Regarding the outcome of cerebrovascular events, it seems that the discontinuation of TKIs alone or switching to a safer one is insufficient to resolve the stenoses of the cerebral arteries, even under dual antiplatelet treatment, anticoagulation, or high-potency statin therapy. Thus, revascularization strategies such as extracranial to intracranial bypass surgery or stenting should be considered, especially when there is no improvement with medical treatment. These observations expand our knowledge on the association between TKIs and cerebral vascular disease, as well as provide more insights into the underlying pathogenesis. TKIs should not only be selected based on disease-related variables but also based on patient-related factors such as cardiovascular comorbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.