Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41473455›Full record

ArticleOccupational therapy international2025

Chinese Graduate Health Science Students' Perceptions of Teaching Pedagogies on Their Educational Experience.

Jeryl D Benson, Richard C Simpson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational therapy international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeryl D BensonOccupational Therapy Department, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, duq.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3088-5375
Richard C SimpsonOccupational Therapy Department, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, duq.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6306-9393

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores pedagogical approaches for teaching Chinese graduate health science students by identifying students' perceptions of teaching and learning strategies that support learning. This study used a survey design to answer the research question: "How do Chinese English as a Foreign Language (EFL) graduate health science students perceive the impact of teaching pedagogies on their educational experience?" Descriptive methods and the Friedman test were used to analyze the data. Data from 34 completed surveys revealed that students perceive responsive instruction and guided feedback (clear, frequent, verbal, and written) as most beneficial to learning. Advance access to notes and materials also supported learning. Student-led oral discussions and nonverbal communications (via student response systems) were deemed less beneficial. Students valued the opportunity to learn and practice clinical skills in the classroom and the clinic. These findings highlight the need for Western instructors to modify teaching strategies to meet the needs of the EFL learner while maintaining the rigor of the health science curriculum content.

Indexed as

Education, GraduateStudents, Health OccupationsTeachingAdultChinaCurriculumEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansLearningMaleSurveys and Questionnairesculturally relevant teachinginternational studentslearner-centered approach

Identifiers

PMID41473455
PMCPMC12745655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.