Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41473396›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences

Limitations of

Lea Klepka, Angelino Carta, Fiona R Hay, Anna Bucharova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Interannual Variation in Seed Traits ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Limitations ofApplications in plant sciences
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lea KlepkaConservation Biology, Department of Biology Philipps University Marburg Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 8 Marburg 35043 Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5946-3792
Angelino CartaDepartment of Biology, Botany Unit University of Pisa Pisa 56126 Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8437-818X
Fiona R HayDepartment of Agroecology Aarhus University Forsøgsvej 1 Slagelse 4200 Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3118-897X
Anna BucharovaConservation Biology, Department of Biology Philipps University Marburg Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 8 Marburg 35043 Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5468-5426

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Premise: Studies comparing seed longevity between species or genotypes commonly measure seed longevity as the time it takes for seed lot viability to drop to 50% ( Methods: We simulated seed viability decline across a range of initial viabilities and rates of probit viability loss (σ) to illustrate how variation in initial viability affects Results: For hypothetical seed lots with identical rates of seed viability loss, variation in initial viability leads to a threefold variation in Conclusions:

Indexed as

comparative studyp50probit analysisseed longevityseed viabilityviability loss rateσ (sigma)

Identifiers

PMID41473396
PMCPMC12747544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.