ArticleApplications in plant sciences
Computer vision species identification of lichens and bryophytes from biocrusts in Australian drylands.
Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Computer vision species identification of lichens and bryophytes from biocrusts in Australian drylands.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Premise: Due to their small size and lack of easily visible macroscopic characters, the identification of cryptogam species has always been challenging. Here, the use of a machine learning computer vision method is explored for the identification of species of lichens and bryophytes from Australian biocrusts. Methods: Three models were trained using mostly images from herbarium specimens. The models were then evaluated based on statistics produced by Microsoft Azure Custom Vision and a bench-test with the CSIRO Horama ID mobile app. Results: Despite the small size and reduced habit of lichens and bryophytes, the Cryptogam (lichens and bryophytes) model performance value is just slightly lower than the performance of a vascular plant model of similar scope (64% accuracy for the Cryptogam model versus 70.3% for vascular plants from Costa Rica). Discussion: The performance of our models suggested opportunities for improvement, including for bias issues caused by imbalanced datasets, white background, and mixed specimens, as well as the difficulty in stabilizing live images at high magnification when using a mobile device to deploy the model. Further opportunities to improve model performance for these small and character-poor organisms, including data augmentation and image segmentation, are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.