Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41473394›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences

PlantSAM: An object detection-driven segmentation pipeline for herbarium specimens.

Youcef Sklab, Florian Castanet, Hanane Ariouat, Souhila Arib, Jean-Daniel Zucker, Eric Chenin, Edi Prifti

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Youcef SklabInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) Sorbonne Université, UMMISCO Paris France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7045-9402
Florian CastanetInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) Sorbonne Université, UMMISCO Paris France.
Hanane AriouatInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) Sorbonne Université, UMMISCO Paris France.
Souhila AribLaboratoire Etis, UMR 8051 CNRS CY Cergy Paris Université Cergy-Pontoise France.
Jean-Daniel ZuckerInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) Sorbonne Université, UMMISCO Paris France.
Eric CheninInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) Sorbonne Université, UMMISCO Paris France.
Edi PriftiInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) Sorbonne Université, UMMISCO Paris France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Premise: Deep learning-based classification of herbarium images is hampered by background heterogeneity, which introduces noise and artifacts that can potentially mislead models and degrade their accuracy. Addressing these effects is essential to enhance overall performance. Methods: We introduce PlantSAM, an automated segmentation pipeline that integrates YOLOv10 for plant region detection and the Segment Anything Model (SAM2) for segmentation. YOLOv10 generates bounding box prompts to guide SAM2, enhancing segmentation accuracy. Both models were fine-tuned on herbarium images and evaluated using intersection over union (IoU) and Sørensen-Dice coefficient metrics. Results: PlantSAM achieved state-of-the-art segmentation performance, with an IoU of 0.94 and a Sørensen-Dice coefficient of 0.97. Incorporating segmented images into classification models led to consistent performance improvements across five tested botanical traits, with accuracy gains of up to 4.36% and F1 score improvements of 4.15%. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the importance of background removal in herbarium image analysis, as it significantly enhances classification performance by enabling models to focus more effectively on the foreground plant structures.

Indexed as

botanical analysisherbarium specimensSegment Anything Model (SAM)semantic segmentationYOLOv10

Identifiers

PMID41473394
PMCPMC12747531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.