Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41473384›Full record

ArticleSouth Asian journal of cancer2025

Real-World Experience of First-Line Osimertinib in EGFR Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers from a Tertiary Cancer Center, India.

Atul Tiwari, Ajay Kumar Singh, Vanita Noronha, Vijay M Patil, Nandini Menon, Minit J Shah, Darshit Shah, Kunal Jobanputra, Mehak Trikha, Ahmad Ubharay and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in South Asian journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Atul TiwariDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Ajay Kumar SinghDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Vanita NoronhaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0191-2744
Vijay M PatilDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Nandini MenonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4214-5799
Minit J ShahDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0979-9555
Darshit ShahDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Kunal JobanputraDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7015-3799
Mehak TrikhaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Ahmad UbharayDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0009-0003-6297-2809
Shashikant YadavDepartment of pharmacology and toxicology, Bombay College of Pharmacy, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Anuradha MajumdarDepartment of pharmacology and toxicology, Bombay College of Pharmacy, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Pratik ChandraniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Rajiv K KumarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Trupti PaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Amit JanuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Nilendu PurandareDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Kumar PrabhashDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osimertinib is approved in the first line in patients with mutations in the sensitive gene epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. There is lack of real-world evidence to illustrate the effectiveness and safety of osimertinib that can reflect the current medical practice especially in resource-constrained setting. A total of 129 patients with histology-proven metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation registered at Tata Memorial Hospital between from March 2018 and May 2023 were analyzed. The parameters studied included demographics, outcomes, safety analysis, and secondary mutations. Most common EGFR mutation was exon 19 deletion 58.9% followed by EGFR exon 21 L858R 39.5% and others 1.5%. The overall median progression-free survival was 21.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.0-58.1) and median overall survival was 31 months (95% CI: 17.8-45). The median duration of response was 21.3 months (95% CI: 17.1-25.5). Of 129 patients, 77.5% had partial response (PR), 10.1% had stable disease (SD), and 6.2% patients had progressive disease (PD) as the first best response with overall disease control rate was 87.2%. In patients with baseline central nervous system disease, 8.9% had complete response, 75.5% had PR and 8.9% had SD, and 2.2% had PD as best response. The overall intracranial response rate was 84.4% and disease control was 93.3%. Skin toxicities (27.1%) and gastrointestinal toxicities (17%) were most frequently observed toxicities. Overall, 63 patients had progression of disease on osimertinib. Subsequently, 58.7% (

Indexed as

EGFR-TKIfirst lineIndiaNSCLCosimertinibreal world

Identifiers

PMID41473384
PMCPMC12747758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.