ArticleSouth Asian journal of cancer2025
Improving Patient Wait Times on the First Day of Radiotherapy Treatment.
Article in South Asian journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of health system interventions to improve access to external beam radiotherapy: a scoping review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Quality improvement methodology implementation for timely MRI-based brachytherapy treatment delivery in watch-and-wait expectant rectal cancer patients.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long wait times on starting day of radiotherapy (day 1) can cause dissatisfaction among both patients and healthcare providers. Reducing these wait times will decrease stress and decongest hospital facilities especially in current coronavirus disease 2019 times. A multidisciplinary core team was formed during the Stanford-India Collaborative Quality Improvement training to reduce the median wait times on day 1 of treatment from 6 to 4.5 hours (a 25% reduction). Several factors were identified on the fishbone diagram, and key causes were identified using a Pareto chart and action prioritization matrix. The Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycle strategy was undertaken for the identified interventions. The outcome measure was time from arrival at the hospital to entry into a treatment room. Data were obtained from time charts at various stations and electronic records. The secondary measures were visual analog scale (VAS) scores, 80th percentile wait times, and the day-2 delay percentage. The balancing measure was "new errors" due to interventions. The interventions included the completion of all administrative tasks not needing patients' presence on the day before day 1. Baseline data from 198 patients and postintervention data from 160 patients were compared and analyzed. The median wait time at baseline, which was 6 hours, was reduced to 4.2 hours. The VAS score showed 70.4, 67.7, and 71.9% satisfaction for the resident physician, therapists, and patients, respectively. The 80th percentile wait times reduced from 8 to 5.7 hours; and the day 2 starting rate decreased from 22.5 to 2.04%, with no new errors reported. Radiotherapy day 1 wait times can be safely decreased, leading to improved satisfaction among patients and healthcare providers, by utilizing classic quality improvement methods and tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.