ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Biochemical evaluation of X-linked hypophosphatemia and tumor-induced osteomalacia: insights into diagnosis and management.
Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) and tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) are characterized by alterations in phosphate metabolism due to elevated levels of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23). These conditions cause significant morbidity due to chronic hypophosphatemia and resulting musculoskeletal disorders. Objective: This study aims to provide clinical strategies for supporting the diagnosis and management of the biochemical profile of patients with XLH and TIO, addressing key considerations beyond the hypophosphatemia and hyperphosphaturia commonly observed in these conditions and addressing the variability and limitations of current biochemical marker detection methods. Materials and methods: A literature search focused on studies published in the last ten years. A multidisciplinary team analyzed the data to integrate the findings into clinical best practices. Results and discussion: The proposed approach emphasizes correctly performing and interpreting tests for serum phosphate, phosphaturia, FGF23, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), parathyroid hormone (PTH), vitamin D, serum calcium, and the calcium-corrected excretion rate. More standardization in screening methods is needed, which affects diagnostic accuracy and management. The recommendations include detailed protocols for patient preparation, sample collection, and interpretation of results. Conclusions: The recommendations for performing biochemical screening for XLH and TIO promote better clinical practices in patient diagnosis and management. Future research should focus on validating diagnostic methods in diverse populations and standardizing biochemical tests. Multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis of these patients through the close collaboration of professionals of laboratory medicine and clinical specialties would be pivotal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.