ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Prediction of
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Patient Selection to Surveillance: Artificial Intelligence Applications in Radioiodine Therapy - A Systematic Review.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Review
- Article
- Artificial intelligence across oncologic theranostics: evidence for patient stratification, dosimetry, and adaptive radiopharmaceutical therapy.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: An accurate assessment of Methods: In this retrospective, multicenter, population-based cohort study, we collected chest CT image datasets for DTC patients with lung metastases from three hospitals in China. Pulmonary metastases were classified into two categories based on the post therapeutic Results: Compared to Inception V3 and ResNet50, our model, ResNeSt50, demonstrated the highest prediction performance in the internal (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.722, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.716-0.725), external validation dataset 1 (AUC = 0.720, 95% CI = 0.691-0.749), and external validation dataset 2 (AUC = 0.731, 95% CI = 0.713-0.748). Conclusion: We developed a simple and robust DCNN model for predicting the Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), ChiCTR1800018047. Registered on 28 August 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.