Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41473236›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Real-world glycemic outcomes of a tubeless automated insulin delivery system: a single-center observational study in Italy.

Silvia Angelino, Maria Ida Maiorino, Michela Petrizzo, Nicole Di Martino, Paola Caruso, Carla Carbone, Alessandro Pontillo, Antonietta Maio, Miriam Longo, Lorenzo Scappaticcio and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Silvia AngelinoDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Maria Ida MaiorinoDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Michela PetrizzoUnit of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, University Hospital Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Nicole Di MartinoDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Paola CarusoUnit of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, University Hospital Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Carla CarboneUnit of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, University Hospital Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Alessandro PontilloUnit of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, University Hospital Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Antonietta MaioDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Miriam LongoDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Lorenzo ScappaticcioDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe BellastellaDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Katherine EspositoDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study is to describe the short-term change observed in CGM-related measures and relevant clinical variables in individuals with type 1 diabetes transitioning to Omnipod 5 insulin treatment within a real-world setting. Methods: The study involved adults with type 1 diabetes treated with Omnipod 5, whose data were collected over a 14-days observation period prior to (Time 0) and following the (Time 1) initiation of the patch pump use. Results: A total of 20 adults with well-controlled glycemia were included in the study. From baseline to follow-up, Time in Range (TIR) significantly increased from 57.3% to 67.3% (P<0.001). Concurrently, there were significant decreases in Time Above Range (TAR) Level 1 (mean difference, -4.7 ± 6.1%, P = 0.003) and Level 2 (-4.2 ± 6.1%, P = 0.018), as well as in Time Below Range (TBR) Level 1 (-1.0 ± 1.1%, P<001), TBR Level 2 (-0.4 ± 0.5%, P = 0.015), and Glycemia Risk Index (-13.8 ± 15.1 P<0.001). Importantly, no significant changes in insulin doses were observed during the study period. Conclusions: Omnipod 5 initiation allowed participants to improve CGM-related metrics and the quality of glucose control in the short-term, without increasing the need for insulin.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Hypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin Infusion SystemsAdultBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlycated HemoglobinGlycemic ControlHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulincontinuous glucose monitoringcontinuous subcutaneous insulin infusionOmnipod 5patch pumptime in rangetype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID41473236
PMCPMC12745233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.