ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Early start of opicapone in Parkinson's disease: evidence from a pooled analysis of phase 3 trials for sustained benefit in patients with recent onset of motor fluctuations.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Levodopa is the mainstay of Parkinson's disease (PD) therapy, but its long-term use is often complicated by the development of motor fluctuations. While COMT inhibitors, such as opicapone, are routinely used for managing motor fluctuations, recent evidence has suggested that earlier vs. later intervention, at onset of motor fluctuations, may provide greater benefits. However, the longer-term impact of earlier intervention has not been well studied. Methods: This pooled subgroup analysis included data from randomized, 14-15 week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of opicapone and their 1-year open-label extensions. Exploratory analyses included all participants who were randomized to placebo or opicapone 50 mg, who continued opicapone into the open-label extension, and had developed motor fluctuations within 2 years before double-blind screening. Motor status was assessed using 24-h patient diaries and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores. Results: This post-hoc analysis included 227 patients who had been diagnosed with motor fluctuations within the prior 2 years (opicapone Conclusion: Early initiation of opicapone in PD patients with recently diagnosed motor fluctuations leads to sustained reductions in OFF-time and improvements in ON-time, without increasing dyskinesia or requiring escalation of levodopa doses. These exploratory findings support revising treatment strategies to include earlier use of opicapone, maximizing long-term benefits for patients with fluctuating PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.