Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41473215›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale2025

Unveiling Hidden Threats: Bacterial Contamination of Frequently Touched Objects and the Biofilm Property of

Rakshya Bhandari, Niroj Man Amatya, Prashamsa Bogati, Purnika Sulu, Pratima Baniya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Unveiling Hidden Threats: Bacterial Contamination of Frequently Touched Objects and the Biofilm Property ofThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rakshya BhandariDepartment of Medical Laboratory Technology, Nobel College, Pokhara University, Sinamangal, Kathmandu, Nepal, pu.edu.np.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9779-8315
Niroj Man AmatyaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Nobel College, Pokhara University, Sinamangal, Kathmandu, Nepal, pu.edu.np.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3398-7422
Prashamsa BogatiDepartment of Medical Laboratory Technology, Nobel College, Pokhara University, Sinamangal, Kathmandu, Nepal, pu.edu.np.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4181-9717
Purnika SuluDepartment of Medical Laboratory Technology, Nobel College, Pokhara University, Sinamangal, Kathmandu, Nepal, pu.edu.np.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7092-6931
Pratima BaniyaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Technology, Nobel College, Pokhara University, Sinamangal, Kathmandu, Nepal, pu.edu.np.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3984-8661

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Frequently touched objects within hospital premises acts as a potential reservoir for healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs), significantly amplifying the risk when biofilm-producing bacteria are involved. These bacteria often exhibit multidrug-resistant (MDR) patterns, complicating the antimicrobial treatments. So, this study intended to determine the bacterial contamination level on frequently touched objects and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns and to determine the relation between biofilm-producing Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted at different intensive care units (NICU and MICU) and operation theatre of Frontline Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. Aseptically, 297 swab samples were collected and cultured, and the isolated bacteria were identified using standard microbiological procedures. Antibiotics susceptibility test done by the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method, and biofilm detection was done by the microtiter plate method at 570 nm by using an ELISA reader. For data analysis, SPSS Version 23 was used. Results: Of total 297 swab samples processed, 31.3% (93/297) showed bacterial growth, yielding a total of 108 isolates. Mixed growth was reported on 16.1% (15/93) samples. The frequency of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria was 95.4% (103/108) and 4.6% (5/108), respectively. The main isolates were coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) 50.9%, followed by Conclusion: A frequently touched object within different intensive care units and operation theatre was found to be contaminated with potential pathogens and normal flora. Bacterial contamination of such objects can contribute to HCAIs and the hands of health professionals can be the mode of cross-contamination.

Indexed as

biofilmCoNSfrequently touched objectsHCAIsMRSAMSSA

Identifiers

PMID41473215
PMCPMC12747103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.