ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Visual analysis of research hotspots and emerging trends in the field of newly graduated nurses.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To systematically analyze the current status, hotspots, and frontiers of Chinese and international studies on newly graduated nurses and to inform subsequent research. Methods: We searched the Web of Science Core Collection and China National Knowledge Infrastructure for literature on newly graduated nurses from January 1, 2015, to April 28, 2025, and used VOSviewer and CiteSpace to visualize and analyze the results. Results: In total, 4,372 English-language and 3,218 Chinese-language articles were included. English-language publications increased steadily, whereas Chinese-language publications showed a fluctuating decline. Both Chinese and English literature focus on mental health issues, with English literature focusing on nursing education and professional experience, and Chinese literature focusing on pre-service training and specialty competence development; English-language studies emphasize clinical decision-making, pre-entry interventions, and related frontiers, whereas Chinese studies further explore transition-shock mechanisms and localized support systems. Conclusion: In research on newly graduated nurses, Chinese- and English-language literature shows distinct focal areas. Future work should enhance international exchange and interdisciplinary collaboration, optimize digitally enabled training pathways, promote deeper integration of practice and education, and establish support systems for the professional development of newly graduated nurses that balance local and global perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.