ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Automated weed monitoring and control: enhancing detection accuracy using a YOLOv7-AlexNet fusion network.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Smart sensing-enabled risk-aware nitrogen prescriptions via conformal profit bounds for precision agriculture.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The agricultural sector is crucial to global sustainability, but it still faces challenges, particularly from weed invasions that severely compromise crop yields. Although considerable efforts have been made to address the weed problem using computer vision detection methods, the technology is still limited. Weedy sites or their crop hosts share many perceptual features, making it difficult to detect with confidence. Most weed detection methods used today suffer from several problems: the inability to distinguish crops from similar-looking weeds, inconsistent performance across weed growth stages, and sensitivity to operational constraints. Previous methods have employed models such as YOLOv5, ResNet, and Faster R-CNN, but have suffered from issues with accuracy, estimation times, and the ability to detect small weeds in dense stands. In this study, we present a hybrid deep learning system that utilizes YOLOv7 for weed detection and AlexNet for weed species classification. YOLOv7 was used due to its fast recognition capabilities and ability to discriminate with better granularity when detecting grass in dense environments. It was found that using AlexNet to classify weed species accurately increases the specificity of the system. Experimental results of the hybrid model demonstrated improvements over previous methods, achieving a precision, recall, F1 score, mAP@0.50, and mAP@0.5:0.95 of 0.80, 0.85, 0.87 0.89, and 0.50, respectively. The field test detection capability showed that AlexNet achieved precision, recall, and F1 scores of 95%, 97%, and 94%, respectively. Thus, these results indicate that the YOLOv7-AlexNet hybrid model provides both robust and efficient real-time detection and classification of weeds in agriculture. The next step is to expand the dataset to include a wider variety of weed species and environmental conditions, and to validate the developed model by deploying the YOLOv7-AlexNet hybrid model on field computers, thereby expanding its practical application in production environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.