ArticleInternational journal of particle therapy2025
Target Coverage Improvement With Dose Matching in Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer.
Article in International journal of particle therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Although carbon-ion radiation therapy (CIRT) creates a sharp dose distribution, inaccurate irradiation positioning may reduce the tumor dose. In pancreatic CIRT, interfractional tumor motion is a factor causing tumor dose reduction. This motion is typically accounted for in the planning target volume, and it cannot provide sufficient margin because the tumor is surrounded by the gastrointestinal tract. Online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) can solve this problem, but other problems such as equipment design and excessive time consumption remain in CIRT. The purpose of this feasibility study was to evaluate the effectiveness of dose matching (DM), which is more convenient than ART in pancreatic CIRT. Materials and Methods: On the in-room computed tomography images, search isocenters were placed 3 dimensionally around the isocenter determined by target matching (TM) at 0.2 cm intervals. The fractional dose distributions were then calculated at each isocenter. The coordinate with the best clinical target volume coverage (CTV V95%) was determined as the DM isocenter. In actual treatment, the use of couch shifting is assumed for irradiation in accordance with the DM isocenter. To evaluate the effectiveness of DM, variations from the initial plan for CTV V95% (ie, ΔCTV V95%) and organ-at-risk (OAR) dose (ΔD Results: The median ΔCTV V95% values in BM, TM, and DM were -2.18%, -1.39%, and -0.36%, respectively. DM significantly improved CTV V95%. OAR doses were within their limits. Toxicity in DM was considered equivalent to that in BM because the maximum ΔD Conclusion: DM significantly improved CTV V95% in pancreatic CIRT within dose constraints of OARs. However, DM should be properly applied by considering treatment efficacy and efficiency. The appropriate use of TM, DM, and online/offline ART is required for each treatment site to improve the target coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.