ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Comparative study on
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Improving the efficiency of in vitro embryo production could be possible by optimizing the media used for oocyte cryopreservation, fertilization, and embryo culture. This study evaluated the fertilization success and developmental competence of post-warmed vitrified cattle oocytes cultured in three distinct in vitro protocols. Methods: A total of 270 immature oocytes were randomly divided into three experimental groups (n = 90 per group), each exposed to different vitrification, warming and fertilization protocols. In Group 1; oocytes were vitrified and warmed using commercial (ART Lab Solutions, Australia) medium, Group 2; oocytes were vitrified and warmed using TCM 199-based solution (prepared medium) and Group 3; oocytes were vitrified and warmed using Bioscience Results: Among vitrified oocytes, BO IVF Conclusion: BO IVF
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.